Greater Phoenix Tea Party Patriots

Patriot Groups throughout the Maricopa and North Pinal County area.


After a three year delay President Barack Hussein Obama finally shows his long form Birth Certificate.  Does this change anything?  Does it shut down the Birther movement or open a new can of worms?  It proves that he is a US Citizen but still does NOT prove he was a Natural Born Citizen.

I think the GPTPP owes a deep debt of gratitude for the leadership efforts of Kelly Townsend (our founder), Jeff Lichter, and State Representative Carl Seel for their efforts and participation in helping Donald Trump force Obama's hand.


Views: 38


You need to be a member of Greater Phoenix Tea Party Patriots to add comments!

Join Greater Phoenix Tea Party Patriots

Comment by SolitarySentry on April 28, 2011 at 4:35pm


Quoting Kurt Nimmo of April 28, 2011:
Our investigation of the purported Obama birth certificate released by Hawaiian authorities today reveals the document is a shoddily contrived hoax. computer specialists dismissed the document as a fraud soon after examining it.
Check out the document released by for yourself.

Upon first inspection, the document appears to be a photocopy taken from state records and printed on official green paper. However, when the government released PDF is taken into the image editing program Adobe Illustrator, we discover a number of separate elements that reveal the document is not a single scan on paper, as one might surmise. Elements are placed in layers or editing boxes over the scan and green textured paper, which is to say the least unusual.
When sections of the document are enlarged significantly, we discover glaring inconsistencies. For instance, it appears the date stamped on the document has been altered. Moreover, the document contains text, numbers, and lines with suspicious white borders indicating these items were pasted from the original scan and dropped over a background image of green paper.


Go to the link and see the video for more info.

"Let’s assume the state of Hawaii scanned the original document and placed it on the green textured background. This does not explain the broken out or separate elements. There is no logical reason for this to be done unless the government planned to modify the document and make it appear to be something other than it is.
There are two elements of interest, as shown in the image to the above – both entries for the date accepted by the local registry. This appears to have been modified in an image editing program.
The media was quick to dispel the fact the document was modified. “Our analysis of the latest controversy: The original birth certificate was probably in a ‘negative’ form, and someone at the White House took it upon themselves to doctor it up so the form can be readable,” writes Joe Brooks for Wireupdate.
Nathan Goulding, writing for the National Review, tells us anybody can open the White House released PDF in Adobe Illustrator and it will break out into layers. “I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home,” he writes.
Indeed, but this does not answer the question why in the Obama birth certificate PDF the layers or elements contain dates – which appear to be modified – and the signature of the state registrar. If the document was acquired from state records in whole, why was it necessary to add elements? Goulding and Brooks do not address this issue.
These layers are also revealed by the White House issued PDF’s hex file in freeware hex editor. Within its code are listed 8 image masks, which if changed from value “true” to “false” turn off and on to reveal the layers as demonstrated in the video and in Illustrator. Whether these represent compression artifacts or other digitizing processes, or whether these masks represent deliberate manipulation remains to be conclusively shown. "

Who are the FRAUD Perpetrators here?    And what is this FRAUD about?

Is Obama and the White House staff so stupid they did NOT see this FRAUD that is so easily detected?

Is Obama that incompetent or is this another DISTRACTION?

The TEA PARTIES and the BIRTHER movement is exonerated !!!


Comment by SolitarySentry on April 28, 2011 at 9:58am

This Birther issue is getting some bad press. 

claiming the birther movement is immune to facts.

I don't like being labeled a kook and you don't either !!!

I took the White House Long Form BC pdf copy (not the Associated Press copy)

and loaded it into my Corel graphics program to see for myself.

I blew it up 400% and looked for the items these experts said were there.

THEY WERE THERE !!!  The blooms, the difference in raster and bitmap pixels, and the pure black pixels.

If I can find them, anyone can !

So in addition to being called a Racist, now I am labeled as a "KOOK"

I think I am in the right,  where is that going to get me??

Comment by SolitarySentry on April 27, 2011 at 7:09pm


   “This Birth Certificate is a pdf (portable document file) file. It is normally meant to be viewed by Adobe Reader or similar program. If it is imported into another high resolution graphics program and expanded then the following facts can be determined. If it were truly a scan of an original long form birth certificate it would have only one graphics layer. This document has at least six layers. The layers are NOT legitimate. There is a combination of bitmap pixels with sharp edges and rasterized pixels with fuzzy edges. That indicates this was a scanned graphic at about 300 pixels per inch and 256 levels of grayscale/color and then modified. The rasterized pixels are from the original scan. The bitmapped pixels are from the modification. A scan would save only rasterized fuzzy edged multi-toned colors and grays. A scan would not save sharp-edged pure colors.
   “The bitmap pixels constitute most of the text and are a computerized font very similar to typewritten characters. These are dense black with no shades of gray around them. A scan of these characters from an original would be dark gray pixels and not black. There are white halos shadowing around every bitmapped area. That probably came from a “bloom” of the graphics program as it integrated the graphics when saved.
   “In the Presidents Long Form Birth Certificate we see a combination of multi-toned pixels and one color bitmapped pixels. That is the indication that identifies it as a modified file.
   “If this was a real pdf file of a real Long Form Birth Certificate, there would be no white halos around the text and the entire image would have a uniformly multi-colored, multi-toned appearance. It does not!
   “It is not only a fake. It is a poorly made fake. “

Why would the White House present this fake as representing the real Hawaiian government scan of an original birth certificate?

“It means they are about to get caught in one of the most blatantly corrupt, deceitful, criminal frauds ever perpetrated on the American people, just like the one that got this president into office in the first place.”

Comment by Moxie on April 27, 2011 at 3:36pm

Obama's BC is not valid and the post before this is only one reason why it is not. Obama's birth certificate, if it were valid, should be reflect a number less than Susan's, because it was recieved one week earlier by the registrar.

Now let me throw a nice big stick into the spokes of this fraud. This really pisses me off and not because I believed for even a minute that he was born her, but because they continue to treat us like we are idiots

In a blog posted on Butterdezillion in 2010 the main blog details and confirms what I said in my previous post about how certificates are collected and required due date.

"In fact, however, below is a list of birth certificate numbers and hospitals I’ve compiled from birth certificates posted online or by personal communications from people willing to give just this information about their certificates. I’ve listed them according to their order in the calendar year (albeit different years, so this is just a general comparison) – which is the order that the numbers would be given if the state registrar numbered the certificates as they were received in the state office"

Date received Cert# Hospital

Jan, 1978     974            Kapiolani

June 1962     8,498            Wahiawa

Aug 1969 9,351            Kaiser (Queens)

Aug 1961    10,637            Kapiolani       This blogger could not have had anyway of knowing what number Obama's certificate would reflect when released today.

Sept 1968    10,170            Army Tripler

Dec 1971    15,396            Kapiolani

Dec 1988    18,644            Army Tripler

Comment by Moxie on April 27, 2011 at 2:48pm

Two of my children were born in Honolulu Hawaii and looking at my daughters Certification of Live Birth I have to wonder why Obama's does not have a raised seal on it. As for the serial number on the Certificate of Live Birth released today the file order does not make sense, although I am sure once addressed someone will have a logical answer. ) : [

Susan's: Mother Sig. 8-7-61 two days after birth 8/5/1961

Obama's: Mother Sig. 8-8-61 four days after birth (Okay this could be why) 8/4/1961 (one day behind susan)

Susan's: Attendant Sig. 8-11-61 six days after birth

Obama's: Attendant Sig. 8-8-61 four days after birth (this puts obama in the lead)

Susan's: Accepted by Registrar General 8-11-61 and Accepted by Local Registrar 8-11-61 

Obama's: Accepted by Registrar General 8-8-61 and Accepted by Local Registrar 8-8-61

Obama's certificate was completed and approved 3 days before Susan's

Obama's birth day fell on a Friday while Susan's fell on Saturday. Obama's certificate, although signed by his mother one day later than Susan's mother, had to reach the registrar first, because all certificates are required to be collected weekly and usually on Friday unless it is a holiday. Susan's was collected the following week and signed by the registrar on the 11th which was a Friday. Had they held Obama's until the following Friday it would have gone 2 days past the due time whereas Susan's could wait because it put her right on time.

Comment by Kelly Townsend on April 27, 2011 at 12:45pm
I am noticing that the birth certificate posted by Hungry4Food for Susan Nordyke, born on Aug 5th, has a serial number of 61 10637. Obama's certificate has a serial number which should be less than that, because he was born on the day before. However, his serial number is 61 10641, four digits later. Anyone know why that is?
Comment by Moxie on April 27, 2011 at 12:31pm


I am looking at the BC now and it clearly reads Oahu.

Comment by Moxie on April 27, 2011 at 12:29pm


Exactly! This is why I have never cared about whether he produced a certificate of birth. The fact remains still that his father was not a United States citizen therefore Obama was not, is not and never will be eligible for the position of president!


Comment by SolitarySentry on April 27, 2011 at 11:32am

It has not even been a half a day and the Long Form challenges are out.

And Donald Trump is being assaulted too.

A web site called the Smoking Gun seems to be the most factual.

I don't believe every thing I see on the Internet,  however


Comment by Karen Szatkowski on April 27, 2011 at 10:50am
I want to see the other writing on the BC, for there's clearly more that's not being shown.

© 2020   Created by Kelly Townsend.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service